Thinking Outside the Box
Decisions made in family court that affect the life of the
young child, but that are not based on well-researched theories
of psycho-social development, such as attachment theory, hurt
the very validity of the court. These decisions also can result
in short- or even long-term psychological damage to the individual.
In
many states, young children do not have legal representation
of their own. Every child should have the right to have his
or her developmental needs fully described in court. That child’s
unique life history must be understood if informed decisions
are to be made on his or her behalf, and appropriate parenting
plans created. This requires an understanding of the research as well as of the
individual child. It cannot be accomplished by lawyers alone. Children also need
advocates who understand developmental theory and research, and their particular
needs.
When evaluating a parenting plan, toddlers and preschoolers
have the ability to indicate how well it is working. Even nonverbal
infants can express their needs in a subtle manner. Advocates
are essential at this stage, as well, to let the court know
if the plan is working. When will this vital process become
standard in the family court system? It seems we have a long
road to travel.
More Thinking Outside the Box
|
Lea esta página en español
TO WHOM DO YOU WANT YOUR CHILDREN TO TAKE THEIR PROBLEMS FIRST?
by Peter Ernest Haiman, Ph.D.
When you are with your child and something or someone upsets you, do you tell
your youngster how you feel? If not, why not? Do you ever speak with your
adolescent regarding the worries you have about a decision you need to make?
If you do, great! If not, what keeps you from doing so? How can children be
expected to speak with their parents about uncomfortable feelings and problems
if their parents do not first talk about some of their own difficulties in
front of their children?
Research tells us that the parent is the most important role model in a child's
life. Most parents, however, fail to use this influence as effectively as
they might in the area of parent-child communications. Very few parents are
aware that admitting their own vulnerabilities and weaknesses to their child
can be seen by the child or adolescent as a sign of the parent's strength.
Most parents feel they must always appear to be strong, right, and without
anxieties in front of their children and teenagers. Youth eventually see this
facade for what it is: a cover-up of fears and weaknesses. More importantly,
in the eyes of a teenager, it is seen as a false self and a lie. When this
young person needs an emotionally strong, resilient, and genuine parent upon
whom to rely, and with whom to develop and mature, the adolescent senses such
a parent is not there for them. This is one reason so many teens feel lost,
become depressed, and turn to peers and/or drugs.
Parents must talk with their young children, and especially with teenagers,
about the truth that each person has his or her own fears, and each has weaknesses
and vulnerabilities. Each person also has strengths. A person's
awareness of and ability to talk about their concerns, worries, and fears
is, in itself, a strength. Having these feelings is not a weakness.
Every person has them. Weakness is not being able to speak openly and honestly
about them.
|